🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.