🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the UK, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an celebration that began as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a business-like atmosphere, broadening to incorporate functions where Black people are remunerated to talk to white audiences about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with seven days of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the North America in winter, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, Deutschland, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The period has developed since that time, giving reduced attention to the accounts of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and more on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the way the month is celebrated is a reflection of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to weakening: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the point of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the shape of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the warmer months we witnessed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a situation where a elected representative gains confidence to say that a lack of white people in certain urban areas is a source of worry. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in Europe as a entirety.

In the America, a massive attack against DEI and affirmative action has been carried, often successfully, to the supreme judicial bodies of the state. A drive to scrub Black history and narrative from the archives is under way. One of the former president's first executive orders focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Given these circumstances, the observance illustrates how little it can be impactful if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or depoliticized celebrations of historical achievements, rather than confronting the conditions of the present. It also reveals how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the more extensive continuous action that is required. Denise Miller, a professor at a learning establishment, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the temporary “tokenism” of the celebration. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it often means that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to adjust, modify and expand actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just eliminate things like Black History Month altogether, thinking they are inadequate for current needs, or are relics of an era that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and heritage of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, DEI programs, and yes, even those talks to businesses – constitute an infrastructure that a lot of work has gone into. It is there not only to deteriorate as the politics moves on (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed throughout the annual calendar (as various establishments are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) incorporated into school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not evade governmental matters, and provides room for citizens, particularly youth, to express their concerns and stories. What value has simple recognition of the past when it doesn’t reckon with the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Organizations who celebrate it should not be comforted with the passive language of hidden discrimination and awareness of minor insults, but challenged by the dangers that affect everyone if anti-racism is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and reactive. It could be that an entire name rebrand is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.